A project at Arizona State University is trying to help election admins identify uses of AI that benefit their constituents — and make up for the lack of staff.

A primer for one of the most uttered misunderstandings about U.S. elections.

Supporting election integrity does not mean undermining elections but investing in what makes them accountable and transparent, former Rep. Matt Salmon writes.

Question 1 in the Pine Tree State fell far short of approval because its opponents described the details mostly right — even if out of order.

For a news website that covers, broadly speaking, “the political process,” the word declare might bring to mind a couple of images. One is the most famous piece of writing committed to parchment in American history. The other is a person speaking up; “stating emphatically,” as one definition goes.

Interviews with former colleagues contextualize the partisan descriptions of Scott Leiendecker, who now leads the rebranded Dominion Voting.

States from Kentucky to Texas are clarifying that only citizens may vote while administrators remind the public how rare the problem is.

Pinal County’s connection to Phoenix illustrates how administrators now spend as much time shaping election policy as running it, with hundreds of bills to monitor every year.

We cannot allow partisan rhetoric to erode faith in the process, writes former North Carolina governor Pat McCrory. Confidence should follow the law, not the party label of winners or losers.